Last November, a damning report by IGN claimed that Black Myth: Wukong creators, Game Science, had created a misogynistic and sexist work atmosphere. Though, one of the issues here is the complete disregard for making sure translations are accurate. There is a claim that lead dev Yang Qi said women shouldn't play his games, which is not true. He had actually said his games aren't aimed at women, which is a completely different sentence. On top of that, he wrote this over ten years ago on a forum thread.
The IGN article first talks about how game devs at Game Science have made dick jokes online, oh the horror. Then with the classic anonymous sources, and finally into something real with co-founder Feng Ji making a post after the initial success of their first game trailer. He makes comments about the team exploding, how it could have been better, and how thankful he is that people are praising Game Science. His wording comes across as crude and at times vulgar, but you can generally understand what he's saying. IGN pulled a specific quote "I want to expand my circle and hire more people, get licked until I can't get an erection". This, is a poor translation and changes the meaning of what he's saying. His actual words are closer to "I want to expand my team and recruit more people, but I can't get an erection after being licked". Vulgar, but not sexist. He's clearly saying that he wants to employ more people but shouldn't get too excited after one trailer received praise.
The next big accusation came from a video released in 2014 depicting the male employees as rapists and porn stars, and the women as hostesses and foot bath attendants. This was made after the game they had worked on, Asura Online, was shut down. The video was made in a comedy style of after-credits "where did they end up...", them being porn stars and rapist criminals was supposed to show them being at rock bottom. Though, the way IGN phrase it, it sounds like they did it as some sort of power fantasy. Again, vulgar, but not sexist. The rest of the article explains how sexist Game Science are, yet it seemingly is them being shown as edgy and vulgar in their language for the most part. I can't find the exact video in question but I believe this video is along the lines of how it is filmed.
Another unconfirmed statement was made by the opposition, claiming that Sweet Baby Inc had tried to extort Game Science for $7m, but there has never been any confirmation of this. The real extortion seems to be these media companies willingly throwing out these accusations to spite this company for refusing to answer to them. The Guardian states how they received no reply other than "no comment" which seemingly angered them, much like it did with IGN. Silence doesn't express guilt, and there is no reason for them to reply to you, if they feel nothing needs to be addressed. It seems to be another case of misinformation being king when it comes to gaming.